From Official Records to Real Insights
We tune housing data like a piano, balancing over- and underpricing until the result is remarkably in key. See how we do it
Peek into the profile of Grange Lane in the WR11 district in Evesham, and see how it sits within the city landscape.
Also, enhance your search strategy with these practical tools.
How much is your home worth?
Get a personalised estimate based on recent local sales and property type.

Why Use M0VE?
Spot undervalued deals in any given area
Find the perfect home that matches your budget and lifestyle
Relocate smarter with side-by-side area comparisons
Take the guesswork out of making an offer
Access the UK's most accurate valuation tool
Get in-depth stats for any street in the UK
Visualise UK market data with interactive charts
Get smarter alerts that go way beyond new listings
Chat with AI trained on real property data
House Prices > Evesham > WR11 > Grange Lane
Easy Essentials about Property Prices in Grange Lane
Grange Lane Property Prices vs Surrounding Areas
Harvington
Compared to Grange Lane, the average property in Harvington is 33% more affordable. (£349,700 vs £524,900) As such, buying in Harvington instead of Grange Lane might put an extra £175,200 back into your budget.
WR11 8
On average, homes in the WR11 8 sector cost 38% less than properties on Grange Lane. (£327,500 vs £524,900) Based on this data, opting for a home on Grange Lane might demand an extra £197,400 compared to other parts of the same sector.
i.e. WR11
Buying in the WR11 district could leave you with a 49% fatter budget than Grange Lane. (£268,800 vs £524,900). Therefore, choosing Grange Lane over the WR11 district could add around £256,100 to your final bill.
i.e. Evesham
Grange Lane carries a property price average 48% above Evesham. (£524,900 vs £272,000) In real terms, this means that choosing a home elsewhere in Evesham over Grange Lane could save you roughly £253,000.
Unpacking WR11: Insights & Info
We tune housing data like a piano, balancing over- and underpricing until the result is remarkably in key. See how we do it
×
Our site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.